三組結果放在一起呈現

Table 2: The correlations between the ChIPPA and ToP in children with autism spectrum disorder (n=20), developmental delay (n=20), and typical development (n=20)

ToP
ChIPPA	IC			IM			FSR			FM			Overall ToP
	ASD	DD	TD	ASD	DD	TD	ASD	DD	TD	ASD	DD	TD	ASD	DD	TD
PEPA	.193	.518*	.239	.025	.348	-.546*	.277	0.78	.093	.425	.414	.076	.286	.441	.084
PEPAco	.200	.406	-.003	.132	.293	-.677*	.270	.259	.115	.521*	.230	-.011	.317	.399	-.083
PEPAsym	.072	.448*	.319	-.142	.287	-.162	.124	-.097	.008	.044	.437	1.41	.074	.339	.176
NOS	-.061	.311	.193	-.015	.100	-.203	.007	-.110	.-291	.056	.415	.156	-.019	.225	-.063
NOSco	-.144	-.323	.061	-.062	-.335	.398	-.052	.069	-.124	-.002	-.144	-.394	-.101	-.233	-.032
NOSsym	.014	.465*	.133	.019	.267	-.279	.039	-.141	-.273	.066	.475*	.255	.037	.336	-.082
NIA	.124	-.308	-.225	-.194	-.030	.100	.452*	-.356	.168	.085	-.222	-.573**	.239	-.332	-.130
NIAco	-.003	-.110	-.153	-.162	.066	.074	.015	-.102	.121	-.038	-.188	-.350	-.026	-.118	-.075
NIAsym	.133	-.375	-.211	-.113	-.089	.093	.471*	-.450*	.233	.112	-.195	-.614**	.268	-.405	-.097
Symbolic play	.090	.543*	.497*	-.061	.153	-.272	.114	.049	.100	.120	.160	.348	.103	.353	.345

Note: ChIPPA, Child-Initated Pretend Play Assessment; ToP, Test of Playfulness; PEPA, Percentage of Elaborate Pretend Play Actions;

NOS, Number of Object Substitutions; NIA, Number of Imitated Actions; PEPAco, Percentage of Elaborate Pretend Play Actions conventional play; PEPAsym, Percentage of Elaborate Pretend Play Actions symbolic play; NOSco, Number of Object Substitutions conventional play;

NOSsym, Number of Object Substitutions symbolic play; NIAco, Number of Imitated Actions conventional play,

NIAsym, Number of Imitated Actions symbolic play; IC, Internal control; IM, Intrinsic motivation; FSR, Freedom to suspend reality;

FM, Framing; Overall ToP, Overall Test of Playfulness.

*p<.05; **p<.001